<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft Analysis: Wide Receiver Strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:39:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=62#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Usually I liked being at the back of the draft, getting those two picks close together.  This year I ended up with #3 in a league and with all the mocks I did I was happy with how that panned out.

There seems to be such a drop off at RB toward the back end and the sure thing WR&#039;s are going so fast in the first few rounds that I don&#039;t mind the three WR strategy that #11 took.  Once one of the RB hungry teams figure out that they are weak at WR may be able to swing a deal too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually I liked being at the back of the draft, getting those two picks close together.  This year I ended up with #3 in a league and with all the mocks I did I was happy with how that panned out.</p>
<p>There seems to be such a drop off at RB toward the back end and the sure thing WR&#8217;s are going so fast in the first few rounds that I don&#8217;t mind the three WR strategy that #11 took.  Once one of the RB hungry teams figure out that they are weak at WR may be able to swing a deal too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaltinTexas</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltinTexas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=62#comment-847</guid>
		<description>I see the logic in both team #10 &amp; #12 strategies.  Team #11, in my opinion, is WR overkill.  My strategy for years has been to go RB on my 1st and (usually) 2nd pick, no matter what draft position I&#039;m in.  Sometimes, depending on what&#039;s available, RB on 1st, 2nd AND 3rd picks.  That strategy has worked very well over the years.
Bottom line, it&#039;s almost always dependent on what&#039;s available when it&#039;s my pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the logic in both team #10 &amp; #12 strategies.  Team #11, in my opinion, is WR overkill.  My strategy for years has been to go RB on my 1st and (usually) 2nd pick, no matter what draft position I&#8217;m in.  Sometimes, depending on what&#8217;s available, RB on 1st, 2nd AND 3rd picks.  That strategy has worked very well over the years.<br />
Bottom line, it&#8217;s almost always dependent on what&#8217;s available when it&#8217;s my pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Burnette</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Burnette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=62#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Simply put my strategy plus the increase in both RB committees and The Pass Game it seems much harder to hit on a solid RB than a Solid WR.  It seems easier to draft a RB in the 4th and 5th round that performs very close to backs taken in rounds 2 and 3 than it is to do the reverse.  Let me know what you guys and girls think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply put my strategy plus the increase in both RB committees and The Pass Game it seems much harder to hit on a solid RB than a Solid WR.  It seems easier to draft a RB in the 4th and 5th round that performs very close to backs taken in rounds 2 and 3 than it is to do the reverse.  Let me know what you guys and girls think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Burnette</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Burnette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=62#comment-795</guid>
		<description>I have retained Fitz, Jennings, and Bowe this year.  It was hard to let Marshall go but I found that he was inconsistent last year even with Cutler at the helm.  With that said I drew the 5th pick in this years redraft and could possible get a Moreno, McFadden, Grant, L Johnson,K Smith or P Thomas.  I understand that these backs aren&#039;t the cream of the crop but note that I could possibly have 3 #1 wideouts.  In most mock drafts I have been able to get Moreno or P Thomas in the 4th and then come back through with a L White and L Johnson.  Also note I look at teams in front of me to see what position they might be taking before it snakes back around to possibly get better value.  Some times I have taken a QB in the 5th but of course every draft is different.  Whatever the case after the first 3 rounds I usually draft RB heavy the rest of the draft and pick of a sleeper around round 10.  With this strategy you dont draft those top guys to ride the bench!!!  Most time my rb core looks something like P Thomas, L White, F Jones, J Jones, Ray Rice, and Mendenhall plus or minus a 1 or 2 guys. I have included a link to one of my mocks. I think its a great team with sleeper value at Rb.  Let me know what you think.

Gunz

http://www.fantasyfootballcalculator.com/draft/477363</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have retained Fitz, Jennings, and Bowe this year.  It was hard to let Marshall go but I found that he was inconsistent last year even with Cutler at the helm.  With that said I drew the 5th pick in this years redraft and could possible get a Moreno, McFadden, Grant, L Johnson,K Smith or P Thomas.  I understand that these backs aren&#8217;t the cream of the crop but note that I could possibly have 3 #1 wideouts.  In most mock drafts I have been able to get Moreno or P Thomas in the 4th and then come back through with a L White and L Johnson.  Also note I look at teams in front of me to see what position they might be taking before it snakes back around to possibly get better value.  Some times I have taken a QB in the 5th but of course every draft is different.  Whatever the case after the first 3 rounds I usually draft RB heavy the rest of the draft and pick of a sleeper around round 10.  With this strategy you dont draft those top guys to ride the bench!!!  Most time my rb core looks something like P Thomas, L White, F Jones, J Jones, Ray Rice, and Mendenhall plus or minus a 1 or 2 guys. I have included a link to one of my mocks. I think its a great team with sleeper value at Rb.  Let me know what you think.</p>
<p>Gunz</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fantasyfootballcalculator.com/draft/477363" rel="nofollow">http://www.fantasyfootballcalculator.com/draft/477363</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hazean - Daily Haze: Lakers win</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hazean - Daily Haze: Lakers win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=62#comment-793</guid>
		<description>[...] year&#8217;s wide receiver class is pretty top-heavy and fantasy owners are varying wildly in wide receiver drafting strategies already. [Fantasy Football [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year&#8217;s wide receiver class is pretty top-heavy and fantasy owners are varying wildly in wide receiver drafting strategies already. [Fantasy Football [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Day</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=62#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Adam, interesting point.  That kind of strategy sounds like it can pay off well if you&#039;re able to draft solid RBs like that later in the draft.  Do you think there will be RBs like that this year?  If you go WR/WR/WR this year, what RBs would you target in the later rounds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, interesting point.  That kind of strategy sounds like it can pay off well if you&#8217;re able to draft solid RBs like that later in the draft.  Do you think there will be RBs like that this year?  If you go WR/WR/WR this year, what RBs would you target in the later rounds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Burnette</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2009/06/draft-analysis-wide-receiver-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Burnette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=62#comment-790</guid>
		<description>I have personally tried all 3 of these draft strategies and find that team 11&#039;s draft strategy leaves me with the best team.  Last year I used my first 3 rounds for Wideouts Fitz, Marshall, Jennings&quot;whom is still underated&quot; and was able to pick up M Moore, L McClain, and P Thomas down the stretch through the waiver wire as the season took its toll.  Also note that I was able to grab T Jones in the 4th and Matt Forte in the 5th &quot;had no clue he would be so good&quot; and later picked up J Cutler in the 8th.  I had more trouble trying to figure out who would get more points for the week than anything else.  I will say that I missed Chris Johnson in the 6th by taking Selvin Young but my point is look at the team that I drafted.  I would rather take 3 sure wideouts that I know are worth starting every week instead of taking an iffy RB because I need to fill the roster spot.  Almost all my starters where top 5 to top 10 players at their respected positions.  I still wonder if I would have won the league championship if I had drafted Chris Johnson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have personally tried all 3 of these draft strategies and find that team 11&#8217;s draft strategy leaves me with the best team.  Last year I used my first 3 rounds for Wideouts Fitz, Marshall, Jennings&#8221;whom is still underated&#8221; and was able to pick up M Moore, L McClain, and P Thomas down the stretch through the waiver wire as the season took its toll.  Also note that I was able to grab T Jones in the 4th and Matt Forte in the 5th &#8220;had no clue he would be so good&#8221; and later picked up J Cutler in the 8th.  I had more trouble trying to figure out who would get more points for the week than anything else.  I will say that I missed Chris Johnson in the 6th by taking Selvin Young but my point is look at the team that I drafted.  I would rather take 3 sure wideouts that I know are worth starting every week instead of taking an iffy RB because I need to fill the roster spot.  Almost all my starters where top 5 to top 10 players at their respected positions.  I still wonder if I would have won the league championship if I had drafted Chris Johnson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

