<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wide receivers are the new workhorses of the NFL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 03:29:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wide Receivers Still Workhorses of the NFL - Fantasy Football Calculator Blog</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Wide Receivers Still Workhorses of the NFL - Fantasy Football Calculator Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=20#comment-812</guid>
		<description>[...] wasn&#8217;t clear if it was a fluke or a new trend in how NFL offenses operate.  To follow up the original article with data from 2008, it looks like it probably is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn&#8217;t clear if it was a fluke or a new trend in how NFL offenses operate.  To follow up the original article with data from 2008, it looks like it probably is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Day</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=20#comment-811</guid>
		<description>markV: Good idea.  Look for an update soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>markV: Good idea.  Look for an update soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markV</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>markV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=20#comment-798</guid>
		<description>You should update this post with a new graph with 2008 stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should update this post with a new graph with 2008 stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: March of the wide recievers - Fantasy Football Calculator Blog</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>March of the wide recievers - Fantasy Football Calculator Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=20#comment-792</guid>
		<description>[...] passing in the NFL along with more running back committees is making the reliable wide receivers pretty valuable. If you&#8217;re used to stocking up on running backs, this might be a good time to evaluate how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] passing in the NFL along with more running back committees is making the reliable wide receivers pretty valuable. If you&#8217;re used to stocking up on running backs, this might be a good time to evaluate how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantasy Football Calculator Blog &#187; 4 Players On Track to Break Records This Year</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Football Calculator Blog &#187; 4 Players On Track to Break Records This Year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=20#comment-155</guid>
		<description>[...] fact that no running backs are at record-setting pace indicates that the league is continuing its new passing trend that I wrote about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fact that no running backs are at record-setting pace indicates that the league is continuing its new passing trend that I wrote about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/2008/08/wide-receivers-are-the-new-workhorses-of-the-nfl/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/blog/?p=20#comment-90</guid>
		<description>In terms of fantasy this is the reason why for the first time I am considering 2 WRs in the first two rounds.

Once you get past the the top 6 RB, most teams are in RBBC mode. WRs are not consistent with their week to week numbers but they have the opportunity for explosive weeks. Splitting carries is not helping my fantasy team. If I draft you in the 1st or 2nd round I need you to carry 20-25 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of fantasy this is the reason why for the first time I am considering 2 WRs in the first two rounds.</p>
<p>Once you get past the the top 6 RB, most teams are in RBBC mode. WRs are not consistent with their week to week numbers but they have the opportunity for explosive weeks. Splitting carries is not helping my fantasy team. If I draft you in the 1st or 2nd round I need you to carry 20-25 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
